
Everyone knows Social is the life of the party.
Twitter. Facebook. Flickr. TripAdvisor. YouTube. FriendFeed. Exactly how social do you or, more accurately your organization, want to be?
Unfortunately, it is an all to common misconception among marketing peers and advertising agencies that one can simply start or create a Twitter page / account, post a couple of updates and watch the campaign ‘go viral.’
Not so fast my friend.
As we saw in Mo’s post last week, Travel Trends: Even More Predictions & Trends for 2009, David Armano & Pete Blackshaw highlighted this point perfectly:
Brands will learn not to “launch and walk away” from from projects; it takes a dedicated and passionate group of group of people to make social media both successful, viable and sustainable. Just look at Zappos, Dell & Comcast. If you’re only interested in launching a Facebook page, a Twitter account and letting RSS feeds do the work, don’t bother starting!
Recently, while speaking with a local CVB, which will remain nameless, they mentioned a lack of success with their Twitter page and campaign. ‘We have been disappointed with the results‘ was the comment I recall. Curious, I decided to have a quick look at their profile. My initial concern was a lack of ‘friending’ between our two agencies…not that everyone has to friend or follow Arizona Tourism…but I found it odd that the CVB in question had not reached out to regional partners who were also on Twitter.
Upon inspection of the Twitter profile, the reason for the lackluster performance of the campaign became quite apparent. The CVB had tweeted infrequently with all of the messages carrying a heavy marketing tone, followed very few friends, had an incomplete profile and was not responding to direct questions or ‘@’ replies. Twitter specific issues, sure, but ones that parallel with other social sites.
Which highlights the second point of this post and in our case, the most important point.
Social sites such as Twitter are simply tools in your overall marketing strategy.
To aid us in the point, we refer to a recent post from our colleague Jason Baer:
…but second and more importantly, is that if you get too caught up in the tools themselves instead of why the tools work in abstract, you’re going to be crying into your keyboard when the tools change. And they will.
Do you really think that Twitter would survive a Google acquisition intact? Could Facebook remain vibrant under the umbrella of Microsoft or Yahoo!? If you are nodding your head, you might want to think about Excite (once a leading search engine, then killed by a new corporate parent), or eGroups and Geocities (formerly huge and then drained of life after being bought by Yahoo!).
Your job should be to learn what people want from tools, not what tools do for people…
Okay, let’s look at that line again:
Social sites such as Twitter are simply tools in your overall marketing strategy.
Tools and sites will change over time, but your core strategy will remain much more consistent.
Think about it from this perspective, ‘My core strategy, goal, mission is to provide travelers with information about my destination to encourage visitation.’ You print a brochure, maintain a physical visitor’s center, staff a call center, develop a website, etc, etc. All to communicate with the traveling public.
So why would your social media marketing strategy be any different?
In the case of the CVB above, why would you choose not to communicate with the traveling public on Twitter? Especially with such a communication focused medium, why would you create a one-way conversation? Lack of understanding? Limited staff? Nervous about negative comments?
It simply does not follow the overall strategy.
While there is something to be said for simply trying out these new social media marketing tools, you should consider a few questions prior to creating your shiny new profile:
- Does our organization want to communicate with the traveling public?
- Does our organization have the staff and resources to provide information, updates and communication?
- Do we have a communication strategy for our campaign?
We could go on, but the questions above provide a good sample. So, you have answered ‘Yes’ to those same questions when you decided to print a visitor’s guide, why would the answers be any different for your social media marketing strategy? Don’t let the medium or tool distract you from the core strategy, of course you need to understand how Twitter works, but if the medium answers the question ‘why,’ then why would you use / view it differently from an overall marketing strategy / messaging perspective?
Your organization is putting forth the effort to print materials, run a call center, etc, etc, it should also be putting forth the same effort (and communication!) in your social media marketing campaign.
Or you can expect poor results…regardless of how ‘viral’ your message may seem.






17 Comments
January 12, 2009 at 9:35 am
Great post. Your CVB example makes me cringe. All too common.
Thanks for the link. Much appreciated.
Cheers,
j
January 12, 2009 at 9:45 am
Thanks for the comment Jason. Yes, much too common.
- Troy
January 12, 2009 at 11:00 am
Sing it, Troy!
Great post and good reading for CVBs (or really, anyone) venturing into social media. Especially those that expect it to be a magic bullet.
January 12, 2009 at 11:01 am
I like the idea of getting to the core principles here. The CVB example sounds like a case of using the wrong tool to achieve their goals. If the original intent isn’t to reach out to your audience and have conversations with them (listening and responding), then social media isn’t going to be successful.
What a lot of organizations run into — I include myself in this — is a lack of strategy. We “experiment,” which can lead to some problems down the road.
At any rate, great post!
January 12, 2009 at 11:10 am
Thanks Irene. Great point on the ‘magic bullet’ idea.
Spot on Keith, if you don’t want to, or don’t have the resources to, have an open dialogue with your consumers then social media is probably not the best tool.
There is certainly something to be said in balancing an experiment versus strategy. I am sure numerous organizations across the board have developed successful campaigns, both social and not, by simply starting an experiment with a tool or medium.
However, I am confident that those organizations had an overall strategy behind the campaign. Perhaps they did not understand exactly how Twitter would function for them, but they (for example) wanted to communicate with the public. Or change perceptions. Or highlight a certain tourism asset.
Your overall strategy is the same, but you select the proper tools to execute the campaign.
Our often quoted, not every tool, solution, social media app is right for everyone.
Or the simpler, just because it is free, does not mean it is right.
January 12, 2009 at 11:47 am
Glad see an “insider” speak the truth. I am frequently questioned/approached by DMO’s who still doubt the power of social media because “their programs just aren’t working” or “it just isn’t our target”. It is way off base. If you communicate the message, people will listen. And, if you inspire and intrigue them, they will engage.
It is a very simple concept. Program success is determined by a solid foundation, coupled with a good strategy and plenty of energy to drive it.
January 12, 2009 at 12:34 pm
Great thoughts Dave. Could not have said that better myself.
Lack of success in social media marketing, whether it is a YouTube page or Facebook app, is most often due to poor messaging and incorrect expectations.
Content is still king.
January 13, 2009 at 8:11 am
[...] Thoughts for Tourism and Travel Agencies on Using Social Media There are a lot of good questions and insight to consider on yesterday’s post from Travel 2.0… [...]
January 13, 2009 at 10:23 am
Troy, as you know, you’re preaching to the choir with me! I want to emphasize that it is essential for organizations to understand exactly what they can do with SocMed to advance their marketing strategies and then set realistic goals and expectations before actively entering and engaging in SocMed. I think a great example of how to appropriately do this can be found in Groundswell and in the Forrester POST strategy – see http://blogs.forrester.com/groundswell/2007/12/the-post-method.html for details.
January 13, 2009 at 11:00 am
Thanks Eric. Oh, we know that you are converted.
That is not the first time the POST strategy has been referred to on the Travel 2.0 blog. But it is important and worth repeating again:
P is People. Don’t start a social strategy until you know the capabilities of your audience. If you’re targeting college students, use social networks. If you’re reaching out business travelers, consider ratings and reviews. Forrester has great data to help with this, but you can make some estimates on your own. Just don’t start without thinking about it.
O is objectives. Pick one. Are you starting an application to listen to your customers, or to talk with them? To support them, or to energize your best customers to evangelize others? Or are you trying to collaborate with them? Decide on your objective before you decide on a technology. Then figure out how you will measure it.
S is Strategy. Strategy here means figuring out what will be different after you’re done. Do you want a closer, two-way relationship with your best customers? Do you want to get people talking about your products? Do you want a permanent focus group for testing product ideas and generating new ones? Imagine you succeed. How will things be different afterwards? Imagine the endpoint and you’ll know where to begin.
T is Technology. A community. A wiki. A blog or a hundred blogs. Once you know your people, objectives, and strategy, then you can decide with confidence.
January 14, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Hello Troy:
This is a insightful analysis and strong advice for DMO’s. I’ve just returned from the American Bus Association Marketplace in Charlotte, N.C. and it became clear to me that the roles of various DMO’s have evolved due the the new context of online marketing and demand for accountability. First, the CVB’s have traditionally served as the sales department for their hoteliers. Now, since hoteliers do not need that function as much as they once did (they now have their own online marketing efforts plus those of 3rd party booking engines), CVB”s new role is to set the brand tone and serve as the concierge for their destinations. Not so easy, and certainly not as lucrative.
State DMO’s which once were responsible for branding and international marketing programs are increasingly functioning as lead generators for the tourism departments of cities.
They need to understand how to use social media in this new context…perhaps an idea that we could employ at E-Tourism Summit in NYC.
January 14, 2009 at 8:17 pm
Thanks for the post Troy. I learn something new everyday (and I usually learn it on a blog or Twitter)!
January 14, 2009 at 11:49 pm
In simple terms, this is what the Travel 2.0 revolution is all about. Its about you, your friends, your neighbours, your colleagues and other people who love to travel and their conversations online about the places they have stayed and their personal opinions of them. It’s about these people sharing their photos, videos, stories, memories and reviews online through social networking, video and reviews sites such as Tripadvisor, Facebook, YouTube and Flickr.com.
With Travel 2.0 it is also possible to highlight the hotel experiences in addition to the price – and some hotels do not capitilase on this opportunity.
January 16, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Guess I’m one of the lucky ones whose CVB Management staff are fully behind these resources, as a way to put a human element back into our marketing efforts. In my two years at the CVB I feel so much more connected to the community this year than my first year, BSM (Before Social Media). We’ve really tapped into our community and have grown, and it’s because our efforts are not just about marketing to, but more about opening up the conversation between partners and stakeholders.
January 29, 2009 at 10:18 am
Great comments Mike.
I think communicating with partners and stakeholders is currently one of the least talked about benefits to social media marketing. It is amazing who you find and what you can get done via a service like Twitter.
January 29, 2009 at 11:55 am
Well i wouldn’t go as long while making comment ….i just found the blog with good information social media marketing ………
January 30, 2009 at 12:42 pm
[...] a communication tool, as social media is inherently a conversation with others. As such, it is a continued effort/conversation, not something to do once and then sit back and [...]